المركز القانوني للأراضي الفلسطينية المحتلة
The Legal Status of The Occupied Palestinian Territory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53840/alirsyad.v3i1.10الكلمات المفتاحية:
Legal Status، Palestinian Territories، Occupation، International Responsibilityالملخص
The legal status of The Occupied Palestinian Territories is a very complicated issue. Therefore, defining the legal status is considered as an introduction which helps determine the legal liability, the legal and political obligations as well as the consequences of such obligations. This study answers some sub-questions besides the following main question: What is the legal status of The Palestinian Territories? This study adopts a mixed-method design: the first is the historical approach which helps to highlight the roots of historical Palestinian Question and follow the political developments in Palestinian territories. The second approach is the descriptive analytical approach which is helpful in analyzing the Legislation and International Conventions and the UN reports. The study aims at defining and clarifying the legal status of the Palestinian territories, and the legal and political obligations and consequences during three periods of time: time prior to Oslo Convention, post establishing Palestinian Authority and the time after Palestine became a non-member observer of the United Nations. The main findings of the study can be summarized as follows: First, the different legal description of the Palestinian territories does not affect the legal status and the direct responsibility of Israeli occupation on the occupied territories, considering it as occupied territories. Second, there is no legal value or effect to Israel's refusal to implement the provisions of Geneva Conventions because Israel is a member of these conventions and it is obliged to apply them. Third, violating conventions is a reason for the international responsibility against Israel. This is apart from the fragility of the Israeli position on applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention on the occupied Palestinian territories in accordance to the legal charters that are established by the international law. This is also the opinion of international community in accordance to the resolutions of United Nations and various international organizations.
يعد الوضع القانوني في الأراضي الفلسطينية المحتلة معقد ا ج د ا، لذلك فإن تعريف المركز القانوني يعتبر مدخلا لتحديد المسؤولية القانونية والالتزامات القانونية والسياسية، وما يبنى عليها من آثار. وتجيب الدراسة على مجموعة من الأسئلة الفرعية، وعلى السؤال الرئيسي: ما هو
المركز القانوني للأراضي الفلسطينية المحتلة؟، وقد اعتمد الباحث في دراسته على منهاج مختلط، منهجين: أولاهما هو المنهج التاريخي: ومن خلاله يمكن الرجوع إلى جذور القضية الفلسطينية التاريخية وتتبع التطورات السياسية في الأراضي الفلسطينية، وثانيهما هو المنهج الوصفي التحليلي: وذلك عبر تحليل التشريعات والمواثيق الدولية والتقارير الأممية ذات الصلة. وتهدف الدراسة إلى تعريف وايضاح المركز القانوني للأراضي الفلسطينية، و الآثار والالتزامات القانونية والسياسية، وفقا لتقسيم زماني على فترات ثلاث، وهي أولا : ما قبل اتفاقية أوسلو، ثاني ا : ما بعد قيام السلطة الفلسطينية، ثالث ا :ما بعد نيل فلسطين صفة مراقب غير عضو في الأمم المتحدة. ويمكن تلخيص أهم ما توصلت إليه الدراسة فيما يلي : أولا : أن اختلاف الوصف القانوني للأراضي الفلسطينية لا يؤثر في مركزها القانوني والمسؤولية المباشرة للاحتلال الإسرائيلي عن الأراضي الفلسطينية، واعتبارها أرا ض محتلة، ثاني ا : أنه لا قيمة أو أثر قانوني لموقف إسرائيل الرافض لتطبيق أحكام اتفاقيات جنيف لكون إسرائيل دولة طرف في هذه الاتفاقيات وبالتالي هي ملزمة بتطبيقها، ثالث ا : أن انتهاك الاتفاقية يعد سببا لقيام المسؤولية الدولية بحق إسرائيل، بالإضافة لهشاشة الموقف الإسرائيلي بشأن انطباق اتفاقية جنيف الرابعة على الأراضي الفلسطينية المحتلة، طبقا للأسانيد القانونية التي أرساها القانون الدولي، وهذا هو الرأي المعتمد من قبل المجتمع الدولي، بموجب القرارات الصادرة عن الأمم المتحدة والهيئات الدولية المختلفة
التنزيلات
المراجع
ʻAbd al-ʻAziz, M. H. (2013). Mabādi’ al-Qānūn al-Insāni al-Dauliyy. Jordan: Dar Al-Hamed for Publishing and Distribution.
Abū Al-Nasr, A. R. (2000). Ittifāqiyyāt Geneva Al-Rābiʻah li Himāyat al-Madaniyyin fi ʻām 1949 wa Tatbíqihā fi al-'Arādi al-Filastiniyyah al-Muhtallah. Palestine: n.p.
Abū Sway, M. (2011). Al-Dawlah Al-Filastiniyyah fi 'Ahkām al-Qānūn al-Diblūmāsiyy al-Dawliyy. Palestine: Ibrahim Abu Lughod Institute for International Studies, Birzeit University.
ʻAdil, I. (2012). Filastin Dawlah Murāqibah al-'Abʻād al-Siyāsiyyah wa al-Qānūniyyah. Geneva: European and Mediterranean Center.
Ahmad, H. (2016). Athār Ittifāq Oslo alā al-Diblūmāsiyyah al-Filastiniyyah. Master Thesis. Palestine: Academy of Management and Politics of Higher Studies.
Al-ʻAbbāsiyy, M. F. (2008). Iltizāmāt Dawlat al-Ihtilāl Tujāh al-Balad al-Muhhtall. PhD thesis. Iraq: Faculty of Law, University of Baghdad.
Al-Ardā, R. (2007). Jidār al-Fasl al-Isrā’iliyy fi al-Qānūn al-Dawliyy. Master Thesis. Palestine: An-Najah National University.
Al-Ghūl, U. (2018). Nahnu Dawlah Taht al-Ihtilāl. http://www.alhaya.ps.
Al-Khātib, N. (2015). Al-Ab'ād al-Siyāsiyyah Walqānūniyyah lil Intihākāt al-'Isrā’iliyyah Lihāq al-Shaʻb al-Filastiniyy fi Masādir al-Mi’ah. Master Thesis. Palestine: Academy of Management and Politics of Higher Studies.
Al-Mezan Center for Human Rights. (2008). Al-Wadʻ al-Qānūniyy li dawlat al-Ihtilāl Al-Harbi wa ma salahiyyātuhā fi al-'Arādi al-Muhtallah. Publications of International Humanitarian Law (5).
Al-Misriyy, S. (2013). Hālat Al-Dawlah Al-Filastiniyyah fi al-Qānūn al-Dawliyy. National Defense Journal, No. 83.
Al-Mūsā, M. K. (2007). Ra'yu Mahkamat al-ʻAdl Al-Dawliyyah bi sh'an Al-Jidār Al-Fasil: Al-'Ab'ād Al-Qānūniyyah. Palestinian Studies Journal, Vol.18, No 96.
Al-Rāyis, N. (2012). Al-Wadʻ Al-Qānūniyy lisujanā' al-Siyasiyyin Al-Filastiniyin fi al-Qānūn al-Dawliyy. Paper presented to International Conference about Palestine in United Nations. Geneva: n.p.
Al-Zānūn, S. (2012). Al-'Abʻād Al-Siyāsiyyah Wal-qānūniyyah: Lil iʻtirāf Bidawlat Filastin. https://www.djazairess.com/alahrar/107029. Retreated on 14/4/2018.
Falk, R. (2014). Taqrir Al-Muqarrar Al-Khās Al-Ma'āni bi hālat Huqūq Al-'Insan fi Al-'Arādi Al-Filastiniyyah Al-Muhtalhah Munzu ʻām 1967. United Nations Human Rights Council. Translation of the United Nations. n.p.
Goldstone, R. (2009). Taqrir bi Ittihād Taqassiyy Al-Haqā'iq Al-Tatbiqiyyah lil 'Umam al-Muttahidah Hawl Al-Nizā' fii Ghazzah. Translation of the United Nations. n.p.
Hamdan, A. (2010). Himāyāt Al-Madaniyyin fi Al-'Arādi Al-Filastiniyyah Al-Muhtallah. Master Thesis. Palestine: An-Najah National University.
Institute of Law. Palestine: Birzeit University. Al-Wad' Al-Qānūniyy fi Filastin. http://lawcenter.birzeit.edu/lawcenter/ar/homepage. Retreated on 14/4/2018.
Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories (2017). Iltizāmāt Dawlat al-Ihtilāl fi Al-Qānun Al-Dawliyy. https://www.btselem.org/arabic/gaza_strip/israels_obligations. Retreated on 14/4/2018.
Palestinian Authority. (2010). Taqrir Lajnat Al-Tahqiq Al-Mustaqillah bi shaʻn Al-Mutābaʻah al-Thāniyah li taqrir bi Ittihad Al-'Umam Al-Muttahidah li Taqassi Al-Haqā'iq bi sha’n Al-Nizāʻah fi Ghazzah. Palestine: n.p.
Satif, S. (2016). Iltizāmāt Sulutāt Al-Ihtilāl Al-'Isrā’iliyyah Tujāh Al-Madaniyyin fi Al-'Arādi Al-Filastiniyyah Al-Muhtallah. np.
التنزيلات
منشور
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2018 Ahmed A. Shehab, Nurazmallail Marni

هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with al-Irsyad: Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Issues agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
al-Irsyad: Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Issues use a variety of waivers and licenses that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/(default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code, or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived in appropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.

















