Persepsi Pelancong Muslim terhadap Aplikasi Realiti Luasan (AR) Berbahasa Arab Berasaskan Prinsip Etika Imam al-Ghazālī (1058-1111 M.) di Selangor, Malaysia
Muslim Tourists’ Perceptions of an Arabic Language Augmented Reality (AR) Application Based on the Ethical Principles of Imam al-Ghazālī (1058-1111 M.) in Selangor, Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53840/alirsyad.v10i2.568Keywords:
Islamic Tourism, al-Ghazālī, Arabic Language, Augmented Reality, Islamic Ethical ValuesAbstract
This quantitative study examined the integration of Imam al-Ghazālī’s spiritual principles of travel (ādāb al-safar) into digital Islamic tourism through an Arabic-based Augmented Reality (AR) application designed for Muslim tourists in Selangor. This study assessed Muslim travellers’ perceptions of AR technology that incorporates Arabic linguistic features and spiritual values grounded in imam al-Ghazālī’s concept of tazkiyah al-nafs (spiritual purification). A structured survey was administered to 400 respondents, comprising local and international Muslim tourists visiting key Islamic heritage sites in Selangor, Malaysia. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation tests. The findings indicated strong acceptance of AR technology in enhancing spiritual reflection, engagement with the Arabic language, and appreciation of Islamic cultural heritage during tourism activities. Furthermore, a significant correlation was identified between AR immersion and the perceived depth of inner spiritual experience. This study concluded that intergrating imam al-Ghazālī’s ethical framework into AR-based Islamic tourism has the potential to foster a more holistic and spiritually conscious form of digital travel.
Downloads
References
Afriansyah, A. (2018). Konsep pemimpin ideal menurut al-Ghazālī. Nalar Jurnal Peradaban Dan Pemikiran Islam, 1(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.23971/njppi.v1i2.905.
Akroush, M. N., Jraisat, L. E., Kurdieh, D. J., Al-Faouri, R. N., & Qatu, L. T. (2019). The perception of non-Muslim tourists towards halal tourism: Evidence from Turkey and Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 9(4), 823–840. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-07-2017-0072.
Al-Ghazālī, A. H. (2004). Iḥyā’ ‘Ulūm al-Dīn. Jil. 3. Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah.
Almulla, K. & Abbasi, M. (2024). The concept of hope in Islamic traditional ideology: A discussion on imam al-Ghazali’s thoughts. International Journal of Religion, 5(11), 1087-1095. https://doi.org/10.61707/86ktk557.
Arif, A., Amin, M., & Prasetiawati, E. (2023). Mahabbah concept according to Abu Hamid Muhammad Al-Ghazali. Quality: Journal of Education, Arabic and Islamic Studies, 1(2), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.58355/qwt.v1i2.28.
Azam, M. S. E., Muflih, B. K., & Al-Haq, M. A. (2024). Intersection between modern technologies and halal tourism: Exploring the role of digital innovation in enhancing Muslim travellers’ experience. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 21(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.33102/jmifr.546.
Azwar, A., Usman, A. H., Noor, U. M., & Abdullah, M. F. R. (2024). Iṣlāḥ of al-Ghazālī’s ideas and movements and their relevance to contemporary Islamic preaching. Ulumuna: Journal of Islamic Studies, 28(1), 453–484. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v28i1.513.
Battour, M., & Ismail, M. N. (2016). Halal tourism: Concepts, practices, challenges and future. Tourism Management Perspectives, 19, 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2015.12. 008.
Borodovskaya, L. (2022). Sufi treatises of Abu Hamid al-Ghazali: Influence on the Tatar culture until the beginning of the 20th century. Islam in the Modern World, 18(3), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.22311/2074-1529-2022-18-3-127-144.
Clair, E. (2005). Algazel on the soul: A critical edition. Traditio, 60, 47–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0362152900000234.
Cornell, V. (2014). Applying the lessons: Ideals versus realities of happiness from medieval Islam to the “Founding Fathers”. Journal of Law and Religion, 29(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2013.7.
Daud, Z., Mohd Haridi, N. H., Alias, N., & Hasin, A. (2021). Kajian perbandingan kalangan pelajar Institusi Pengajian Tinggi terhadap simptom stres yang dialami ketika sesi pengajaran dan pembelajaran dalam talian era Covid-19. Al-Irsyad: Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Issues, 6(1), 615–627. https://doi.org/10.53840/alirsyad.v6i1.136.
Dayrobi, M. & Tanjung, D. (2024). Maqasid syariah perspective Abu Hamid Muhammad Bin Muhammad Al-Ghazali. AMK: Abdi Masyarakat UIKA, 3(3), 111-116. https://doi.org/10.32832/amk.v3i3.2218.
Ercan, F., Sayın, K., Dalgın, T., & Gençer, K. (2025). A bibliometric and systematic review of publications on augmented reality in sustainable tourism. Sustainability, 17(4), 1508. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041508.
Guefara, R. (2024). Hubungan ilmu tasawuf dan ilmu kalam dalam perspektif Abu-Hamid Muhammad (Al-Ghazali). Jurnal Manajemen dan Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(3), 303-307. https://doi.org/10.61132/jmpai.v2i3.354.
Günther, S. (2025). Al-Ghazālī on logic as a means of learning. Al-Abhath, 73(1-2), 27-71. https://doi.org/10.1163/2589997x-0730102003.
Hamid, A. (2022). Konsep guru menurut Abu Hamid Muhammad Al-Ghazali (Imam Al-Ghazali). Aktualita, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.54459/aktualita.v12i1.391.
Han, D.-I., Weber, J., Bastiaansen, M., Mitas, O., & Lub, X. D. (2019). Virtual and augmented reality technologies to enhance the visitor experience in cultural tourism. In M. T. Dieck & T. Jung (Eds.), Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality: The Power of AR and VR for Business (pp. 113–128). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06246-0_9.
Hariani, D., Hanafiah, M. H., Anuar, N. A. M., & Ahmad, K. N. (2024). Promoting halal tourism in sharia-compliant destination: Insights on Aceh competitiveness and tourist perceived value and behavior. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/14673584241283902.
Humble, N. & Mozelius, P. (2022). Content analysis or thematic analysis. European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, 21(1), 76-81. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecrm.21.1.316.
Husniyah, N., & Salim, N. (2023). Konsep ideal pendidikan Islam perspektif Imam al-Ghazali. Studia Religia: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.30651/sr.v7i2.20588.
Ibrahim, M., Usman, A. H., & Razi Shahabudin, M. F. (2022). Psikoterapi al-Ghazālī: Kajian terhadap maqāmāt dalam Kitab Iḥyā’ ‘Ulūm al-Dīn. Islāmiyyāt: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 44, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.17576/islamiyyat-2022-44IK-9.
Jaffar, M. N., Ab Rahman, A., Rashid Abdul Hamed, K., Ahmad, M. I., Ritonga, M., & Noor Azam, M. H. (2024). Development of augmented reality Arabic for Islamic tourism: Sustainable education need analysis. IJAZ ARABI: Journal of Arabic Learning, 7(2), 571–585. https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v7i2.25794.
Khan, N. (2025). Integrating halal tourism with sustainable development: The role of technology and governance. Sustainability & Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01503-3.
Kirabaev, N., & Al-Janabi, M. (2018). The Sufi path of al-Ghazali. In 2nd International Conference on Culture, Education, and Economic Development of Modern Society (ICCESE 2018) (pp. 1275–1278). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccese-18.2018.282.
Kodirov, D. (2021). Theory of knowledge in the treatise of al-Ghazali al-kistasu-lmustakim (Right Scales). The Light of Islam, 3, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.47980/iiau/2021/3/2.
Konurbaev, M., & Конурбаев, С. (2016). An essay on the history and hermeneutics of Naṣīḥat al-Mulūk by Ghazālī, Abu Ḥamid Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad al-Tūsī: The symbolic and cultural code. Servis Plus, 10(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.12737/17487.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308.
Kukkonen, T. (2025). Al-Ghazālī and Ibn Rushd on the end of the world. Theology and Science, 23(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2025.2514315.
Kumalasari, D., Haris, M., & Hakim, L. (2024). Maqashid syari’ah imam ghazali dalam ekonomi dan praktik. Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research, 2(8), 106-111. https://doi.org/10.62504/jimr825.
Lohr, C. (2000). The Arabic background to Ramon Lull's Liber Chaos (ca. 1285). Traditio, 55, 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0362152900000076.
Maharani, N., Muzakki, A., & Islam, S. (2024). Kriteria pemimpin perspektif imam al-Ghazali dalam kitab Ihya’ Ulumuddin. Jurnal Keislaman, 7(1), 149-169. https://doi.org/10.54298/jk.v7i1.251.
McBrayer, G. & El-Rayes, W. (2015). Al-ghazālī’s moderation in belief. American Journal of Islam and Society, 32(4), 117-120. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v32i4.1010.
Mian, A. A. (2022). Agents of grace: Ethical agency between Ghazālī and the anthropology of Islam. American Journal of Islam and Society, 39(1–2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v39i1-2.2951.
Mirsepassi, A., & Fernée, T. (2024). The intellectual thought of al-Ghazālī. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009538114.
Mohammed, W. (2022). A qualitative exploration of the absence of sport psychologists in sport clubs: The coaches' perspective. Humanities Journal of University of Zakho, 10(1), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.26436/hjuoz.2022.10.1.829.
Mustafa, F., Bin Daud, M., Bin Yussuf, A., Kasasbeh, N., & Abu Khurma, O. (2025). The practice of augmented reality in Islamic education and the level of motivation among UAE secondary school students. Social Sciences, 14(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14020080.
Ouertani, H. C., & Tatwany, A. (2019). Augmented reality-based mobile application for real-time Arabic language translation. Communications in Science and Technology, 4(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.21924/cst.4.1.2019.88.
Pourjavady, R., & Schmidtke, S. (2016). Twelver Shīʿī theology. In S. Schmidtke (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology (pp. 456–472). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199696703.013.41.
Quraisy, S., Holis, K., & Hasan, M. (2023). Pemikiran pendidikan Abu Hamid Muhammad Bin Muhammad Al-Ghazali. Pedagogika Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kependidikan, 3(1), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.57251/ped.v3i1.959.
Ridzuan, A. H., Norfezah, M., & Nur’Hidayah, C. A. (2020). Augmented reality (AR) concept in hospitality education: Advantages and challenges. International Journal of e-Learning and Higher Education, 13(1), 137–149. Dicapai daripada https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/81078/.
Said, N. (1970). The significance of al-Ghazālī and his works for Indonesian Muslims: A preliminary study. Studia Islamika, 3(3), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v3i3.799.
Sandelowski, M. & Leeman, J. (2012). Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1404-1413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312450368.
Sandelowski, M. (1995). Qualitative analysis: What it is and how to begin. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(4), 371-375. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180411.
Syed Ahamed Suban, S., Kumar Madhan, M., & Shameem Shagirbasha, S. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of halal and Islamic tourism. International Hospitality Review, 38(2), 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1108/IHR-05-2021-0038.
Usman, A. H., Salleh, N. M., Shaharuddin, S. A., Nasir, M. N., Wazir, R., & Shahabudin, M. F. R. (2020). Implementation of Sufism in worship: A review of the treatment of paedophilia. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(14), 1511–1514. http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.14.337.
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(3), 398-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048.
Vargas-Sánchez, A., & Moral-Moral, M. (2020). Halal tourism: Literature review and experts’ view. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11(3), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-2017-0039.
Wagner, R., & Briggs, A. Al-Ghazali’s Pilgrimage, The Penultimate Curiosity: How Science Swims in the Slipstream of Ultimate Questions. Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747956.003.0017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohammad Imran Ahmad, Mohd Norzi Nasir, Mohammad Najib Jaffar, Rafidah Haji Abdullah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with al-Irsyad: Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Issues agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
al-Irsyad: Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Issues use a variety of waivers and licenses that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/(default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code, or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived in appropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.

















