Expression of Wa al-Sāriq wa al-Sāriqah in al-Hidāyah wa al-‘Irfān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān bi al-Qur’ān by Muḥammad Abū Zayd al-Damanhūrī
Lafaz “Wa al-Sāriq wa al-Sāriqah” dalam al-Hidāyah wa al-‘Irfān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān bi al-Qur’ān karya Muḥammad Abū Zayd al-Damanhūrī
الكلمات المفتاحية:
Thieves، Adulterer، Deviant Interpretation، al-Damanhūrīالملخص
Muḥammad Abū Zayd al-Damanhūrī, a controversial Egyptian Quranic exegete, presents interpretations in al-Hidāyah wa al-‘Irfān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān bi al-Qur’ān that significantly diverge from traditional scholarship, leading to a publication ban by al-Azhar University. One of his contentious views involves the expression Wa al-Sāriq wa al-Sāriqah (WSS) in surah al-Mā’idah [5] verse 38, which he interprets as referring only to habitual thieves (al-ta‘awwud). According to him, an occasional or one-time act of theft does not merit the ḥadd punishment of amputation. He argues that this severe penalty, resulting in permanent disability, should only be applied after all preventive measures have failed and when theft has become an ingrained habit. This study employed a qualitative method to examine al-Damanhūrī’s interpretations in al-Hidāyah wa al-‘Irfān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān bi al-Qur’ān. The findings indicated that his interpretation of the Arabic morphological form ism al-fā‘il is inconsistent with the consensus of Muslim scholars and indicative of al-tafsīr al-ilḥādī (deviant exegesis), due to its implicit rejection of the ḥudūd law. Such a view risks misleading the public into believing that initial offenses carry no legal consequences, thereby undermining the deterrent function of Islamic law.
Contribution: This study critically re-examined the claim that the Arabic morphological form ism al-fā‘il necessarily implies repetition or continuity, an assumption central to al-Damanhūrī’s interpretation. It highlights the necessity of adhering to established hermeneutical principles developed by authoritative scholars to safeguard the integrity of Quranic interpretation and uphold the ethical and legal foundations of Islam against distorted or ideologically driven readings.
التنزيلات
المراجع
Abdul Kadir, M. N., Hassan, M., & Ibrahim, M. (2007). Tafsiran Quran dalam perspektif Jaringan Islam Liberal. Islamiyyat, 9, 93-120. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/21339477/_ms_Tafsiran_Quran_dalam_Perspektif_Jaringan_Islam_Liberal.
Al-‘Abādī, A. Q. (1983). Risālah fī ism al-fā‘il. Amman, Jordan: Dār al-Furqān.
Al-Azharī, K. (n.d.). Sharḥ al-taṣrīḥ ‘alā al-tawḍīḥ. Vol. 2. Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyyah.
Al-Bantānī, N. (1997). Marāḥ labīd li kashfi ma‘ānī al-Qur’ān al-majīd. Vol. 1. Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-Ma‘rifah.
Albayrak, I. (2012). Reading the Bible in the light of Muslim sources: From isrāʾīliyyāt to islāmiyyāt. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 23(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2012.655062.
Al-Bukhārī, M. I. (1980). Al-Jāmi‘ al-ṣaḥīḥ. Vol. 4. Cairo, Egypt: Al-Salafiyyah.
Al-Damanhūrī, A. Z. (1930). Al-Hidāyah wa al-‘irfān fī tafsīr al-Qur’ān bi al-Qur’ān. Cairo, Egypt: Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī wa Awlāduh.
Al-Dhahabī, M. Ḥ. (1976). Al-Tafsīr wa al-mufassirūn. Vol. 2. Cairo, Egypt: n.p.
Al-Dhahabī, M. Ḥ. (1986). Al-Ittijahāt al-munḥarifah fī tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-karīm: Dawāfi‘uhā wa daf‘uhā. Cairo, Egypt: Dār Wahbah.
Al-Dhahabī, M. Ḥ. (2000). Al-Tafsīr wa al-mufassirūn. Vol. 2. Cairo, Egypt: Maktabah Wahbah.
Al-Ghalāyaynī, M. (1989). Jāmi‘ al-durūs al-‘Arabiah. Vol. 1. Beirut, Lebanon: al-Maktabah al-‘Aṣriyyah.
Al-Ghazālī, A. Ḥ. (n.d.). Al-Maqṣad al-asnā fī sharḥ asmā’ Allah al-ḥusnā. Cairo, Egypt: Maktabah al-Qur’ān.
‘Alī Jumuʿah, M. A. W. (2017). Bayn al-tajdīd wa al-tabdīd Muḥammad Abū Zayd al-Damanhūrī Namūdhajan. Majallat Al-Farā’id Fī al-Buḥuth al-Islāmiyyah Wa al-ʿArabiyyah., 34, 257–298. Retrieved from https://search.mandumah.com/Record/964860.
Ali, M. (2022). Hadith. In O. Leaman (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Islamic Ritual and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003044659.
Al-Juzaīrī, ‘A. R. (n.d.). Al-Fiqh ‘alā al-mazāhib al-arba‘ah. Vol. 5. Cairo, Egypt: Maktabah al-Tawfīqiyyah.
Al-Khaṭīb, A. S. (2021). Al-Tafsīr al-mādī li al-Qur’ān al-Karīm al-istimdād wa al-imdād Tafsīr al-Hidāyah wa al-ʿIrfān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān bi al-Qur’ān unmūdhajan. Majallat Al-Jāmiʿah al-Qāsimiyyah Li al-‘Ulūm al-Sharʿiyyah Wa al-Dirāsāt al-Islāmiyyah, 1(2), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.52747/aqujssis.1.2.62.
Al-Qaraḍāwī, Y. (2001). Kayfa nata‘āmal ma‘a al-Qur’ān al-‘aẓīm. Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-Shurūq.
Al-Raḍī, D. A. (1973). Sharḥ al-Raḍī ‘alā al-kāfiyah. Vol. 3. Beirut, Lebanon: n.p.
Al-Subkī, B. al-D. A. Ḥāmid. (2001). ‘Arūs al-afrāḥ fī sharḥ talkhīṣ al-miftāḥ. Vol. 1. Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Al-Zamakhsharī, A. Q. M. (1998). Al-Kashshāf. Vol. 5. Beirut, Lebanon: Maktabah ‘Abīkān.
Al-Zarkalī, K. D. (1986). Al-A‘lām. Vols. 1, 4, 5, 6 & 7. Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-‘Ilm al-Malāyyīn.
Bakhash, K. H. I. (2000). Al-Qur’āniyyūn wa shubhātuhum ḥawla al-sunnah. n.p.: Maktabah al-Ṣiddīq.
Bisanadī, K. (n.d.). Ta’ammulāt ism al-fā‘il ma‘nāhu wa ‘amalahu min khilāl al-Qur’ān al-karīm wa qirā’atahu. Cairo, Egypt: Jāmi‘ah ‘Ayn al-Shams.
Cavanagh, S. (1997). Content analysis: Concepts, methods and applications. Nurse Researcher, 4(3), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.4.3.5.s2.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. New York, NY: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Downe‐Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
Fakih, F. (2015). Reading ideology in Indonesia today. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 171(2–3), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17102007.
Freedman, A. L. (2009). Civil society, moderate Islam, and politics in Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Civil Society, 5(2), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448680903154907.
Ghazali, A. M., Asyyaukanie, L., & Abshar-Abdalla, U. (2009). Metodologi studi al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Gibb, H. A. R. (1947). Modern trends in Islam. Champaign, Illinois, USA: The University of Illinois Press.
Gillespie, P. (2007). Current issues in Indonesian Islam: Analysing the 2005 council of Indonesian ulama fatwa No. 7 opposing pluralism, liberalism and secularism. Journal of Islamic Studies, 18(2), 202–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etm001.
Hamdi Usman, A., Avivy, A. L. F., & Farid Ravi Bin Abdullah, M. (2021). Asbab al-nuzul and the rules of interpretation: Some notes on M. Quraish Shihab’s Views. Jurnal Penelitian, 18(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.28918/jupe.v18i1.3789.
Hasanzadeh, S., & Renani, A. A. (2023). A peaceful interpretation of jihad in the Qur’an. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 46(12), 2501–2520. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2021.1935716.
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.
Ibn Hishām, A. M. (2003). Awḍaḥ al-masālik. Vol. 3. Beirut, lebanon: Al-Maktabah al-Maṣriyyah.
Ibn Kathīr, A. F. I. (2000). Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘aẓīm. Vol. 7. Ghiza, Egypt: Mu’assasah Qurṭūbah.
Kersten, C. (2009). Indonesia’s new Muslim intellectuals. Religion Compass, 3(6), 971–985. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00187.x.
Mahyudi, M. (2019). Islamic economics as an integrated social science: Novel ideas on its foundations. In N. Kizilkaya (Ed.), Methodology of Islamic Economics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429320804.
Majestya, N., & Prayoga, S. C. (2022). From Moderatism to Islamophobia: Indonesian Muslim identity discourse in Nurman Hakim’s Islamicate film trilogy. Contemporary Islam, 16(2–3), 449–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-022-00494-6.
Morgan, D. L. (1993). Qualitative content analysis: A guide to paths not taken. Qualitative Health Research, 3(1), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239300300107.
Motzki, H. (2001). The collection of the Qur’ān. A reconsideration of western views in light of recent methodological developments. Der Islam, 78(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/islm.2001.78.1.1.
Muzakki, Akh. (2007). Current debates in the post-Soeharto Indonesian Islam: Examining the intellectual base of liberal and anti-liberal Islamic movement. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 45(2), 321–366. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2007.452.321-366.
Pink, J. (2010). Tradition and ideology in contemporary sunnite Qur’ānic exegesis: Qur’ānic commentaries from the Arab world, Turkey and Indonesia and their Interpretation of Q 5:51. Die Welt Des Islams, 50(1), 3–59. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006010X489801.
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. New York, NY: Sage.
Shihab, M. Q. (2005). Tafsir Al-Mishbāh: Pesan, kesan dan keserasian al-Qur’an. Vol. 9. Jakarta: Lentera Hati.
Shihab, M. Q. (2010). Tafsir Al-Mishbāh: Pesan, kesan dan keserasian al-Qur’an. Vols. 3 & 8. Jakarta: Lentera Hati.
Sībawayh, A. B. A. (n.d.). Al-Kitāb. Vol. 1. Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-Jīl.
Soleimani, K. (2016). The politics of the khilafa, old and new. In Islam and Competing Nationalisms in the Middle East, 1876-1926 (pp. 49–69). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59940-7_3.
Souryal, S. S., Potts, D. W., & Alobied, A. I. (1994). The penalty of hand amputation for theft in Islamic justice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22(3), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(94)90021-3.
Stewart, D. J. (2009). Poetic license in the Qur’an: Ibn al-Ṣāʾigh al-Ḥanafī’s Iḥkām al-rāy fī aḥkām al-āy. Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 11(1), 1–56. https://doi.org/10.3366/E1465359109000576.
Usman, A. H., Abdullah, M. F. R., & Ibrahim, M. (2023). Kaedah pentafsiran M. Quraish Shihab dalam Tafsir al-Mishbah. Selangor: Penerbit UPM.
Usman, A. H., Abdullah, Mohd. F. R., Abdul Kadir, Muhd. N., & Iskandar, A. (2022). The concept of an ideal society: A review of Fazlur Rahman’s Perspective. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 6, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.21.2022.220.
Usman, A. H., Ahmad, Z. A. S., & Possumah, B. T. (2024). I ‘dilū huwa aqrab li al-taqwā: Analisis wacana mufasirun pada surah al-Mā’idah [5] ayat 8 dalam melestarikan keharmonian masyarakat. al-Irsyad: Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Issues, 9(2), 1292-1305. https://doi.org/10.53840/alirsyad.v9i2.479.
van Bruinessen, M. (2009). Liberal and progressive voices in Indonesian Islam. In S. T. Hunter (Ed.), Reformist Voices of Islam Mediating Islam and Modernity (pp. 21–27). New York, NY: Routledge.
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. New York, NY: Sage.
Weiss, B. (1978). Interpretation in Islamic law: The theory of ijtihād. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 26(2), 199-212. https://doi.org/10.2307/839668.
Ya‘qūb, Ṭ. M. M. (2005). Asbāb al-khata’ fī al-tafsīr: Dirāsah al-ta’ṣīliyyah. Riyadh, KSA: Dar Ibn al-Jawzi.
Yāsīn, Z. Ḥ. (1934). Ḥāshiah ‘alā sharḥ al-fākihī li qaṭr al-nadā. Vol. 2. Cairo, Egypt: Muṣṭafā al-Bābi al-Ḥalabī.
التنزيلات
منشور
كيفية الاقتباس
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2026 Abur Hamdi Usman, Mohd Farid Ravi Abdullah, Azwar Azwar, Muhammad Aizat Syimir Rozani
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with al-Irsyad: Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Issues agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
al-Irsyad: Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Issues use a variety of waivers and licenses that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/(default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code, or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived in appropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
